<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JacksonDunstan.com &#187; types</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/tag/types/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacksondunstan.com</link>
	<description>Mastering AS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Array vs. Vector Part II</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/649</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/649#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s article is in response to some interesting comments on the previous article comparing Array&#8216;s performance to that of Vector. Today I&#8217;ll test different types of Vectors and the performance of deleting elements. Intro Jean-Phillipe Auclair commented that deleting elements was his problem with Array and Vector. Meanwhile, aaulia commented that the pain was in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/649/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details of toString()</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/92</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/92#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When an object is converted to a String, it is first checked for a toString() method. But there are subtleties to this that you may not have considered. The behind-the-scenes call to your class&#8217; toString() method can be very convenient: class Vector3 &#123; public var x:Number; public var y:Number; public var z:Number; public function toString&#40;&#41;: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/92/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Null and Undefined</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/34</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/34#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually languages just have one way to specify &#8220;no value&#8221;. Call it null or nil or whatever you&#8217;d like, but AS3 and JavaScript have two: null and undefined. Here&#8217;s a little bit to help you understand when and why you&#8217;ll come across the two as well as some tricky differences between them. Null is much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/34/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
