<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JacksonDunstan.com &#187; for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/tag/for/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacksondunstan.com</link>
	<description>Mastering AS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Loops With int and uint</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1258</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1258#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[int]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AS3 has two integer types: int and uint. In my experience, most AS3 programmers just use int everywhere and ignore uint. This is usually acceptable as the need for unsigned integers is rare compared to their signed counterparts. However, there are significant performance differences between the two. Read on for the impact of uint on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1258/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Vs. While Revisited</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/997</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/997#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[while]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote an article last November titled For Vs. While that needs a bit of updating an expanding today. While I updated the performance figures in my series on Flash 10.1 performance, I continue to get questions in the comments section of the original article that explore new areas. So today we&#8217;ll look at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/997/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Vs. While</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/486</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/486#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[while]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been seeing more and more usage of while loops by those who I presume are interested in performance. I&#8217;ve always assumed that these was not faster than for loops, but today I am finding out. I was taught in school that for loops are syntax sugar one small step beyond while loops. That [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/486/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

