<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JacksonDunstan.com &#187; access specifiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/tag/access-specifiers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacksondunstan.com</link>
	<description>Mastering AS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Better OOP Through Namespaces</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1242</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1242#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access specifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namespaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Namespaces may make poor function pointers, but you&#8217;d be wise to not write them off so quickly. It turns out that they have an altogether different usage that can help you blend the speed advantages of public fields with the encapsulation and information hiding of getters and setters. Read on to learn more about this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1242/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Function Performance</title>
		<link>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/413</link>
		<comments>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/413#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access specifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[function variables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overriding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With access specifiers, statics, plain functions, and overriding, there are a lot of ways you can dress up a function in AS3. But how many programmers really know the performance implications of these options? Read on to find a straightforward test showing just that. EDIT: added functions defined in interfaces, getters, setters, and final functions. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/413/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

