Comments on: AS3 vs. JavaScript Performance Test Followup http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534 Mastering AS3 Mon, 14 May 2012 17:02:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: jackson http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12679 jackson Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:29:58 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12679 OK, that's enough "Flash vs. HTML5" links. :) OK, that’s enough “Flash vs. HTML5″ links. :)

]]> By: fox http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12678 fox Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:22:12 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12678 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHHr3rE19Wg&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHHr3rE19Wg&feature=related

]]> By: fox http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12673 fox Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:07:28 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12673 another: http://www.taterboy.com/blog/2010/05/flash-vs-html5/ another:
http://www.taterboy.com/blog/2010/05/flash-vs-html5/

]]> By: fox http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12670 fox Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:46:52 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12670 and this: http://www.taterboy.com/blog/2011/02/movethis-another-as3-tweening-animation-engine/ and this:
http://www.taterboy.com/blog/2011/02/movethis-another-as3-tweening-animation-engine/

]]> By: fox http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12653 fox Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:48:27 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12653 or this: http://lab.simurai.com/html5/ads/ or this:
http://lab.simurai.com/html5/ads/

]]> By: fox http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-12652 fox Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:34:56 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-12652 Have a look at this fact here : http://www.jamesward.com/census2/ Have a look at this fact here :
http://www.jamesward.com/census2/

]]> By: Aaron http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-477 Aaron Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:55:56 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-477 No one with one hundredth of a brain codes AS3 untyped except in extremely specific use cases. That comparison would be completely invalid. No one with one hundredth of a brain codes AS3 untyped except in extremely specific use cases. That comparison would be completely invalid.

]]> By: jackson http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-455 jackson Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:49:02 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-455 Looks like I only added Opera 10 to the chart. It was in the spreadsheets, but I hadn't added Chrome 3 (Chrome 4 was a typo). I hadn't considered using untyped AS3. Does anyone code this way? If so, are they interested in performance? I haven't seen this... Thanks for pointing out the errors! Looks like I only added Opera 10 to the chart. It was in the spreadsheets, but I hadn’t added Chrome 3 (Chrome 4 was a typo).

I hadn’t considered using untyped AS3. Does anyone code this way? If so, are they interested in performance? I haven’t seen this…

Thanks for pointing out the errors!

]]> By: Kevin Newman http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/534/comment-page-1#comment-454 Kevin Newman Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:34:27 +0000 http://jacksondunstan.com/?p=534#comment-454 It looks like Safari 4 is on par with AS3, and Chrome 4 isn't even listed (is that a typo in your wrap up?). Also, is this comparing typed AS3, to untyped/dynamic JavaScript? What happens if it's untyped/dynamic Actionscript 3.0 vs. dynamic JavaScript? It looks like Safari 4 is on par with AS3, and Chrome 4 isn’t even listed (is that a typo in your wrap up?).

Also, is this comparing typed AS3, to untyped/dynamic JavaScript? What happens if it’s untyped/dynamic Actionscript 3.0 vs. dynamic JavaScript?

]]>